HOW COMMERCIAL PROJECTS ARE DELIVERED

Our Commercial Construction Process

Every commercial construction project follows a defined delivery process. These processes dictate when the contractor is engaged, how design decisions are made, how pricing is established, and where risk ultimately lives.

See comparison
Black and white clock showing 12:24.

On Time

Outline of a hand holding a coin with a dollar sign in a circle above it.

On Budget

Icon of a badge with a checkmark inside, indicating approval or certification.

Higher Quality

Magnifying glass icon inside a circle on a black background.

Zero Surprises

What Makes Our Process Different

While most contractors operate within the same three delivery models, outcomes vary dramatically depending on when the contractor is involved, how costs are managed, and whether collaboration or competition is incentivized.

Understanding these delivery methods is the first step in understanding why Stronghold’s process produces different results.

INDUSTRY-DEFINED PROCESSES

The Three Standard
Commercial Construction
Delivery Methods

Across the U.S., commercial contractors operate under one of three primary construction delivery models. These methods are widely accepted and commonly used — particularly in Oklahoma and surrounding markets.

  • PRICE-DRIVEN SELECTION

    Design–Bid–Build is the most common commercial construction process. In this model, a designer or architect completes the full design before contractors are invited to bid. The project is typically awarded to the lowest-priced bidder.

    Key characteristics:

    • Design and construction are fully separated

    • Contractor input occurs after design is complete

    • Trades are selected based primarily on price

    • Budget risk largely shifts to the owner after construction begins

    Because contractors and trades are not involved during design, this method often leads to constructability issues, change orders, and budget surprises once work is underway.

  • EARLIER INVOLVEMENT, LIMITED INTEGRATION

    Construction Manager at Risk introduces the contractor earlier in the process. The contractor provides pre-construction services and later delivers the project under a Guaranteed Maximum Price (GMP).

    Key characteristics:

    • Contractor engaged during design

    • Budget estimates provided at design milestones

    • Contractor assumes some construction risk

    • Design and construction still operate in separate lanes

    While CMAR offers improved visibility compared to low-bid delivery, it remains partially siloed and does not fully integrate trades or pricing early enough to eliminate downstream surprises.

  • SINGLE CONTRACT, SHARED CONTROL

    In Design–Build delivery, the owner contracts with a single entity responsible for both design and construction. This model reduces handoffs and can accelerate schedules.

    Key characteristics:

    • One contract for design and construction

    • Faster timelines through overlap

    • Reduced administrative complexity

    • Limited independent cost validation

    While Design–Build can improve speed, it often reduces transparency unless safeguards are in place to independently validate pricing and risk.

STRUCTURE THAT CREATES SURPRISES

Where Traditional Delivery Methods Fall Short

Each of these delivery models functions within established industry rules — but two of these commonly suffer from the same structural issues:

X Contractors engaged too late to influence design decisions

X Pricing developed without full trade participation

X Risk pushed downstream to owners

X Limited cost transparency

X Adversarial dynamics between parties

An aerial view of a construction site where workers are pouring concrete into long, narrow trenches. Several workers wearing safety helmets and vests are handling tools and guiding the concrete. The site is surrounded by dirt and some green grass.

A Better Commercial
Construction Process

Stronghold Construction operates within these same delivery frameworks — but executes them differently using a progressive, federally approved methodology known as CMGC / Progressive Design Build.

THE STRONGHOLD WAY

A Gantt chart illustrating three project delivery methods: Traditional Design-Bid-Build, Construction Manager at Risk, and Stronghold Delivery Method. Each method includes phases with corresponding timelines marked by horizontal bars.

THE STRONGHOLD ADVANTAGE

A Process Built for Predictability

✓ Early Integration

We engage trade partners during design to ensure buildability before the first shovel hits the dirt.

Real-Time Pricing

We provide open-book estimates validated by the current market, eliminating budget guesswork.

Proactive De-Risking

We identify and resolve structural or site hurdles upfront to keep your timeline on track.

A triangular logo with a black outline, featuring a stylized blue 'S' and gray or black 'V' in an angular, geometric style.

Why This Process Matters

Most commercial construction failures are not execution problems — they are process problems. Stronghold’s methodology exists to eliminate uncertainty before it reaches the jobsite. By restructuring the commercial construction process around early collaboration, transparency, and accountability, Stronghold delivers projects that are predictable, profitable, and built to last.

Ready to start your next project?

A Commercial Construction Process Built for Modern Projects

Stronghold Construction provides owners with a modern commercial construction process designed for today’s projects — not outdated systems that create chaos.